bobgarlitz

splash, plash, burble

July 5, 2008 · No Comments

new fountain in the garden

→ No CommentsCategories: Current Affairs

study in blacks and greens

July 3, 2008 · No Comments

Ok, not an art photo at all. All day we had been looking for Virginia’s hand splint. We were beside ourselves looking everywhere for it. Couldn’t imagine where it had gotten to since Virginia rarely even takes it off. We went walking at the docks. Came home and looked all over again. A breeze stirred outside, the air smelled sweeter, the muggy humidity of the day moved off.  I looked out the window and there it was—where else of course but on the grill.  (which looks like one of those catafalques in church from my childhood).

Now where are those tweezers we’ve also been looking for all day?  Virginia got a nasty splinter from the docks railing today.  I slept in one of the white chairs up on the Inn lawn.  Nice breeze.

→ No CommentsCategories: Blogroll · Current Affairs · Photos

unknowing, or the delights of

July 2, 2008 · No Comments

interesting comments by Rauschenberg

“I usually work in a direction until I know how to do it, then I stop,” he said in an interview. “At the time that I am bored or understand — I use those words interchangeably — another appetite has formed. A lot of people try to think up ideas. I’m not one. I’d rather accept the irresistible possibilities of what I can’t ignore.”

He added: “Anything you do will be an abuse of somebody else’s aesthetics. I think you’re born an artist or not. I couldn’t have learned it. And I hope I never do because knowing more only encourages your limitations.”

→ No CommentsCategories: Painting

Marie Javins in Africa

July 1, 2008 · No Comments

Finished Marie Javins’ Stalking the Wild Dik-Dik. Liked it in spite of myself, even though at first you think it is not that good. Then you realize that it IS good, really good. She is no Paul Theroux, nor is she trying to be. And that is all to her credit. She traveled up through Africa. He went Cairo to Capetown, she the reverse. Extremely different travels and travelers. She did things he would never be caught dead doing, like joining up with safari groups. As much as I liked his book a great deal, I liked hers as much precisely because she gives you all the personal and cultural detail out of the corner of her eyes. Her eyes are great. She complains a lot about things and yet that helps make us there with her. This IS what travel is like. She is good company. You would love to talk with her, meet her. A lot of people can complain and be terrible company. And she does not go back and rifle through books to flesh out her rants and observations. Rather she crisply and curtly describes the people and the hassles. And the tedium. Remarkable how well she writes about that. She is every bit as experienced as Theroux but not out to write a book. She is about moving along, seeing some things but not interested in making a big deal. She’s not out to force grand ideas down our throats. As a result, her book conveys great vitality, the life of all those she meets. She did post her trip on an ongoing website, still up. So she got her immediate audience there. Big generational difference. Later when she wrote this book she had the site and the immediate responses and could draw on all that and recompose her narrative from that base. Her book is a sharp account of hard travels through Africa at the end of her year of touring the world & she writes with economy and clarity, & no sentimentality in spite of 9/11 happening in the middle of her trip when she is on the Muslim island of Zanzibar. And maybe her book will become after all a literary gem because of all of this. Ten times better than, say, Robin Davison’s camel walk across Australia, Tracks. Better as a book. Javins can write. Davison cannot. Javins is mightily experienced at travel and this gives her a practical sense of scope and detail and perspective. She keeps it clipped and paced & you get a great sense of what this sort of trekking and traveling is like for the tough and sensitive souls who can do it. Reminds me so much of Tamminnee Taylor, the Australian young woman who traveled for over five years all over the world.

http://www.mariesworldtour.com/

→ No CommentsCategories: Books · Current Affairs · Travel

Pagan Babies nostalgia

June 29, 2008 · No Comments

found this website with the Great name & social mission—–

http://www.warbabynotaboomer.blogspot.com/

“Pagan Babies”

Any one go to Catholic Grade Schools in the 50’s and 60’s? Remember the “Pagan Babies“?

In order to raise money for the missions, the grade school students were asked to bring in pennies and nickels to save a Pagan Baby. It took $10.00 to save a baby. For every $10.00 collected you got name the baby.

In most classrooms to encourage donations, the nuns pitted the boys against the girls. Least we forget, the donations were collected daily and tallied on the blackboard. I am not sure when this practice ended.

Did you ever wonder what happened to all of the “Pagan Babies“?

This Sunday at Mass a missionary priest had an answer. The missionary work by Catholic priests and nuns is allowing Catholic priests from foreign countries to pastor the priest empty parishes in America.

The work of the missionaries converted the native peoples to the Catholic Religion.

Now I had not given the “Pagan Babies” a thought in years. It is an amazing to think all of those pennies and nickels really helped the children in need. And now they are helping us!

→ No CommentsCategories: Blogroll · Current Affairs

the Pope does NOT wear Prada

June 29, 2008 · No Comments

Stole this from Nicolas Colloff’s website—-

The Pope does not wear Prada but…

Jun. 27th, 2008 | 09:31 am
location: Moscow
mood: amused amused

As reported (see below) in today’s Guardian, the official Vatican newspaper has scotched the wicked, frivolous rumour that the Pope shops at Prada. In doing so it declared that, ‘The Pope is not dressed by Prada but by Christ’!

This rather frivolously gave me the image of the Pope wandering around attired in a wooden box given that our Lord was a carpenter.

Nevertheless the newspaper’s image of the Pope as a ’simple and sober’ man is rather undone by the subsequent report in Corriere della Sera that the much admired scarlet footwear were, in fact, hand crafted by an Italian shoemaker and that the Pope possesses three pairs including a ‘nappa leather pair for hot Rome summers’!

This reminds me of Tolstoy’s peasant frocks - hand tailored in Moscow from the finest linen!

Both interesting definitions of simplicity and sobriety! But what interests me most is why we cannot allow the Pope to be human with a streak of fondness for fine footwear and the sheer pomposity of the denial.

Here is the text of The Guardian article:

“The devil may wear Prada, but following months of speculation the Vatican has put paid to the idea that the Pope is also a fan of the top-end Italian designer.

Benedict XVI’s reputation as an bookish theologian with austere tastes took a knock shortly after his election when pictures of him wearing a pair of simple but elegant red slip-on shoes fuelled speculation among Vatican-watchers that the pontiff was hiding a penchant for high fashion.

In recent months Benedict has fanned the flames by donning sunglasses that would not look out of place on Keanu Reeves and stepping out in an array of eye-catching headwear, including a red velvet cap with white ermine trim and a red panama hat.

But a strongly worded article in the Vatican daily L’Osservatore Romano has struck back at the gossip, calling Benedict a “simple and sober man” who does not - regardless of the sleek appearance of his shoes - shop at Prada.

Italian daily Corriere della Sera confirmed that Benedict’s scarlet footwear was in fact made by Italian shoemaker Adriano Stefanelli, who has also supplied calfskin versions for winter wear and a nappa leather pair for hot Rome summers.

As for his hats, Benedict is simply staying true to his traditionalist take on the papacy by wearing clothes used by past popes, wrote the Vatican daily. “The Pope is not dressed by Prada but by Christ,” it stated, adding that anyone insisting he is a fashion clotheshorse is indulging “in a frivolousness which is extremely characteristic of an epoch which renders banal everything it doesn’t understand”.


→ No CommentsCategories: Current Affairs · Travel

entry # 1 (not iPhoto enhanced)

June 27, 2008 · No Comments

→ No CommentsCategories: Blogroll

entry # 2 for AVA

June 27, 2008 · No Comments

→ No CommentsCategories: Blogroll

AVA entry #1

June 27, 2008 · No Comments

Next week I’ll take two paintings over to AVA gallery in Lebanon to try to get into the 15th Annual Juried Summer Exhibition.  Virginia and I looked at some paintings from the studio today and chose these two.

Have no idea what the show is like, what my chances are, but what the heck.

→ No CommentsCategories: Painting

Watt’s happened?

June 26, 2008 · No Comments

26 June About 40 pages into Watt you can see Beckett finally becoming Beckett. Now I’m really glad I took the trouble to read his prose fiction from chronological beginning to this point.

The previous novel, Murphy, now suddenly recedes fast into the past, into the “beginnings” phase of the development of this writer.

In Watt the narrative voice starts a paragraph with “Haw!” twenty-eight pages into the book (I’m using the new Grove collected so it is page 199 of volume I). And with that Beckett as we now know him has emerged. And he has his narrator even mark, remark, upon the shift by talking at ridiculous length about a shift, a change.

We could be super dramatic in lit crit fashion and say Here, here it is, the precise moment when Modernism shifts into Post-Modernism. I’m late to Beckett so I’m sure plenty of critics have already opined thusly about this long passage.

But in what did the change consist? What was changed, and how? What was changed if my information is correct, was the sentiment that a change, other than a change of degree, had taken place. What was changed was existence off the ladder. Do not come down the ladder, Ifor, I haf taken it away. This I am happy to inform you is the reversed metamorphosis. The Laurel into Daphne. The old thing where it always was, back again. As when a man, having found at last what he sought, a woman for example, or a friend, loses it, or realizes what it is. And yet it is useless not to seek, not to want, for when you cease to seek you start to find, and when you cease to want, then life begins to ram her fish and chips down your gullet until you puke, and then the puke down your gullet until you puke the puke, and then the puked puke until you begin to like it. The glutton castaway, the drunkard in the desert, the lecher in prison, they are the happy ones. To hunger, thirst, lust, every day afresh and every day in vain, after the old prog, the old booze, the old whores, that’s the nearest we’ll ever get to felicity, the new porch and the very latest garden. (203/204).

Watt says he once nodded to Mr Ash in the midst of a snowstorm on Westminster Bridge, a man he merely knew only enough to nod to. Ash digs his watch out of layers and layers of clothing and says “Seventeen minutes past five exactly, as God is my witness, remember me to your wife (I never had one), . . . A moment later Big Ben (is that the name?) struck six. This in my opinion is the type of all information whatsoever, be it voluntary or solicited. If you want a stone, ask a turnover. If you want a turnover, ask a plumpudding.” (205)

Cheery advice these days as we listen to too much news about oil prices and the economy and the bombing of Iran between the election and the inauguration. Etc.

→ No CommentsCategories: Books