Why do I find mail so wonderful and always feel compelled to publish it somehow to someone?? No one knows what blogs are or what they are for, so here is an instant "collage" of today’s mail—a few identifiers changed to protect the unsuspecting and unsolicited for permission. Something about the theft itself also appeals to me. If you are a correspondent and think I need to seek help and desist from instant plagairistic publication, please do let me know. This ain’t art by any stretch but maybe the impulse toward it is somehow implicit?
—–
Hi
there_
Hope
all is well. We had to move out of DC into the burbs of Northern VA. I am not a
burbs man. We are now in Reston, which is about 40 minutes from DC. There are
some positives in terms of space and our new place, but I am not a burbs
man.
Anyhow, I hope that this finds you well. Will you be here in
March?
——–
Bob:
I’ve been reading Slavoj Zizek’s "The Pupper and the
Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity" and writing my intro to the
Merton on Writing book. Zisek argues that Christianity is a stage one
must pass through to arrive at an enligthened materialism.
Thinking about this in the light of Merton’s vocation as a writer, I
came to see that Classical writers believed in representation,
modernist writers in the inscription of subjectivity, and postmoderns
in "transgression." I think what seperates a Christain take on all this
from Zisek’s "Enlightened" materialism has to do with the Christian’s
eschatological perspective. Writers can only embrace "transgression" if
they believe in progress, in an unfolding through time past cultural
barriers. Representation makes sense only if you believe in the
progress of knowledge. But high Modernism, like Christian
apocalyptic thought, has a different relationship to time. That is why
Ratzinger’s dialogue with Metz regarding time and history cuts to the
heart of what disignates a Catholic (or Christian) alternative to
contemporary philosophy and why Joyce and Eliot still matter.
But
what exactly is this different relationship to time? The Christian
writer (Merton) is not exactly writing for eternity but he is not
offering his works as transgressive moments in the great battle against
totalizing philosophy either. What is the idea of time in the perennial
"philosophy?"
Maybe one must pass through Zizek’s materialism to
arrive at a Christian perennialism! But what am I saying? Anything?
Help!
——–
This past week I stopped by Frank Walker’s apartment which
is filled with weird art, strange furniture that looks like something
from the Inquisition, weight lifting barbells with humongous weights,
and, of course, pornography. He also had a new book about Cumberland,
which he recived as a Christmas gift from one of his sisters, who still
lives in Cumberland..
The book was put together by a sociology teacher at Allegany HS.
Harry Stegmaier also writes some history passages. It’s almost
exclusively about the Baltimore Street area in the 1950s and 1960s.
Three things struck me:
1. How well people were dressed. As one women is quoted in the
text, "In those days, we dressed up better to go shopping on Baltimore
Street than we dress for a party today."
2. How thin people were. American fat hadn’t arived yet. Both
men and women were trim, even elegant. That we-go-bowling look was
nowhere to be seen.
3. Baltimore Street looked so lively and thriving. I
particularly enjoyed – and remembered – the decorations in the snow at
Christmas time.
Adding all three together, I realized that I’m now an old man who
remembers an era when not only things were different, but so were
people.
Sobering!
————-
well, nice weekend with only a smattering of work. still not get my
head round metre and rhtyhm or teaching it.
and kind of constantly churning ideas for ‘writing lyrics’ in my head also.
so not entirely restful.
nice lunch out today, but aborted the Bicton park visit due to rain
and bad weather.
send me some mexican sunshine!