Monthly Archives: January 2008

Deft Wings

Just finished another fine read—Cees Nooteboom’s Lost Paradise—

Will cheat and paste in a review from The Complete Review website-


The complete review‘s Review:

       There are two main characters in Lost Paradise: Dutch literary critic Erik Zondag and the young Brazilian woman Alma. Nooteboom intersects their very separate lives in an unusual and feathery-light (at least on some levels) novel of fate and paradise. And angels.
Alma and her friend Almut leave Brazil after Alma drives her car, as if in a daze, into a very bad neighbourhood and quickly finds herself — as she chose to falsify it for herself — “enveloped by a black cloud”, everything stripped from her: “They had not bothered to kill her, but had simply left her behind as if she were rubbish.” The more adventurous and orderly Almut is an appropriate companion to then head out into the world with. They take a course in physical therapy massage so they’ll have a skill that is marketable everywhere and don’t have to fall back on waitressing and the like. They head to Australia, where Alma looks for some escape in the dreamtime world of the aborigines; later Alma also winds up in Austria.
Zondag, meanwhile, is a fairly dissatisfied writer, stuck the past “twenty years in the rarefied atmosphere of the literary supplement”. He’s not so much an author as a part of the literary “clean-up crew”, who had gotten his permanent position at his newspaper by making: “quite a name for himself by taking potshots at a few literary giants” . Indeed, there’s quite a bit of criticism of the Dutch literary establishment in the novel — including a swipe at the old grandees of Dutch literature, that Nooteboom-fellow among them ….. Zondag doesn’t like what’s become of the literary world — “Literature had become a career” is one of his complaints — and then:

All that mediocrity week after week seemed to cling to his hair and creep under his nails.

Alma and Zondag’s paths cross, in unlikely ways, first in Australia, where Alma has gotten a job as a hidden angel (in something between performance art and tourist game), and then in Austria, when Zondag goes on a Kur. It sounds almost perfectly ridiculous — even more so in the details — and yet it’s also truly audacious. Nooteboom weaves a surprisingly intricate but still ever so light-feeling tale here, the narrative moving back and forth between the two characters (and from first to third person too), sometimes describing the seemingly mundane with a great deal of precision, other times offering only general impressions. It’s occasionally dizzying, especially in its reach across continents and shifts in voice and character, but it also pulls the reader in.
Throughout the angelic themes, and paradise (and paradise lost) also figure, but even when he literally transforms Alma into an angel he knows exactly how to handle it to avoid it becoming too ridiculous. Stuffed in a cupboard, her face turned to the wall: it’s an almost absurd situation, but both her and Zondag’s reactions to it are convincing.
Lost Paradise is remarkable in its combination of realism and its almost spiritual flights of fancy. Nooteboom is both a very attentive and imaginative writer, and he uses his talents to very good effect here. From the Prologue-chapter, in which the first-person narrator is flying to Berlin and gives a short précis of where he’s been and what he’s done — subtly foreshadowing what’s to come later in the book — Nooteboom already lets the reader see what to expect: the descriptions seem straightforward enough, even the author’s curiosity about the book an attractive woman sitting a row ahead of him is reading. He can’t catch a glimpse the title until they’ve almost landed, when he sees the two words:

     It’s this book, a book out of which she is about to disappear, along with me.

The playfulness and the games work, and while Lost Paradise feels (and reads) like a very light work, it lingers satisfyingly, a small but surprisingly sating morsel.

- Return to top of the page -

 

U red it ‘ere fust

Just posted my review of Castle Freeman’s Go With Me on Amazon. I might be the first to do so. If so, yet another claim to fame to post on my tombstone. Freeman is in People magazine this week. Fame is being thrust upon him. A movie on this novel is already in the high-level talking stages. The book is terrific. What else did I say? I compared it to McLean’s A River Runs Through It for the brilliant perfection of the writing style. Here is a choice passage early in the story.

Conrad was married to Whizzer’s younger sister. He was a smart man, but he was a man who didn’t know the ground. He didn’t know the ground, and he thought you could learn the ground by asking questions. A man of questions, a man from away.

The story moves like a great card game. Perfect ear for the local central Vermont speech patterns. Perfect sense of the soul of the region, Vermont, New England, the north woods, the loggers who work it. Funny, scary, subtle, brilliant social commentary, insight, character. All so economical and sharp. Reminds you of Beckett, Hemingway, Chekov, Vonnegut, hundreds of wonderful writers. Elmore Leonard and Chaucer already mentioned by another reviewer on the back cover. One reviewer says he finished it he had a beer and read it all over again. Easy to believe that. Kirkus Reviews calls it a “small masterpiece.” Trouble is it is like a Morandi painting—small may be small but when it is this masterful it ain’t small. Have to thank Jessica for putting me onto the book. She was here for a visit two weeks ago and she told me all about the excitement surrounding it before publication, including the movie talk. (Clooney.) Jess has known Castle and Alice for years in Vermont. Kudos to all and sundry. What a delightful book. Who will not love it?

hanging at the Hood

Last night we went over to Dartmouth with friends to hear Sean Scully give a talk, “The Devil’s Dress,” that marked the opening of a great exhibit of his work at the Hood Museum.

Rupert had told me about his Agressive Interview up at Gists and Piths.  I gave him this report on the Opening.

Speaking of aggressive, Sean Scully sends his best regards.  Talked
with him briefly last night and he said you were the only other
painter now working with “moral rigour, against decadence” and with
any feel for the “grit essential to great painting.”  he’s now working on
aluminum—though none of those pieces on view.  About 40 works,
including 20? small ones, about 15 big ones.  pretty impressive.
he did indeed use those phrases in his talk–very easy to snooze at
4:30 pm as he showed slides and spoke very slowly and softly.  huge
guy–6’6″ maybe, huge head.  Irish to the bone.  Would be fun in a pub
but was a bit too on good behavior for the occasion, the audience (academic)
and the videotaping going on.  Got a brochure I’ll send you.  The work
is impressive for sure.  Here’s a working class guy who has conquered
the world with paint.  was poetic in an abstract way, has spoken about
his work so much he’s really good at it.  quoted from Kuspit and a
few others.  had an eloquent little riff on Morandi after someone asked
about him.  also had a put-down of the ab ex generation that I’ve
forgotten—might have been that they were “primitive” or “easy” or
“mechanical.”  ?  Made a big deal of showing how his work was the
perfect next advance in painting after minimalism.  (Though me wonders
if his move to aluminum isn’t a circling back to the search for
minimalist perfection?)  Packed hall (150?) and an overflow hall on
closed circuit.  Dressed in black (like a good jesuit), subtle stripe
woven into the black pullover.  I asked him about Bram Van Velde
and he sort of gave a dismissive look like was I serious & then
said, well, poor guy had no money, had to paint with guoache which
is like painting with bird shit, never connected with a scene,
the europeans were out of luck then, new york was it.  Might have
tried to talk some more but it was hard to hear in the crowd and
he was surrounded by others wanting a chat.  Also he would bludgeon
you in a moment if you had the wrong opinion on whatever, it
felt like.  Pretty major “new york” evening for us hillbillies

up here in the north woods.   He was seated in that little hallway  at
entrance opposite the Sol Lewitt wall painting from about twenty years
ago—vertical and horiontal stripes in muted pinks, greens, golds and
reds.  About as opposite Scully’s work as possible—except for the stripes.

who reads this stuff??

1659l1.jpg
great “agressive interview” with Rupert Loydell at Gists and Piths

here’s a sample

You say “the avant garde is where the interesting stuff happens”, but this is relative. If the “interesting stuff” is only interesting to a minority, then surely it is merely “stuff that interests geeks”? You point out that some stuff does cross over, like cut up and collage techniques, which implies that the geeks get left behind. Do you think geeks deserve more recognition for what they do, or should they continue to work in obscurity and let people with a better understanding of the mainstream carry their ideas across to society? And why?

Who you calling a geek? As I said in my last answer, the world has more and more small networks. I’m happy in my network[s] of readers, colleagues, friends, publishers, students and fellow writers. Human beings all have different tastes, and that’s fine.

We all need entertaining at times – so sometimes I watch TV and sometimes I like funny rhyming poetry – but I can’t abide people telling me they are writers when they don’t understand how language works and what it can do. You don’t have to like Jackson Mac Low or Charles Bernstein’s poetry, but it’s not incomprehensible: if you move beyond content, the poems work in the same ways that mainstream poets do. That is the work is constructed with language, with words, deliberately organised and arranged for the viewer (even if a chance procedure has been used in the writing process).

Zinc coins next to the woodpile

dsc04660_2.jpg    Yesterday Dennis & I went to see Sweeney Todd. Loved it. So glad that he did too, since he had seen it years ago and has held it in great favor ever since. he filled me in first on what to enjoy, how to listen to the music and that did indeed help. Very dark but delightfully even beautifully stylized and so the blood doesn’t feel all that “bloody.” Music very beautiful & Depp can sing quite well. Helena Bonham Carter fantastic as Mrs Lovett. Great cast all the way through. Joan and Robin Bowers were there and some teenagers behind us who had perfect laughs at all the right scenes and lines.

last night was the fundraiser dinner to the fuel assistance community closet fund at the Senior Center. Big turnout, Archie Steenburgh did the live auction.

Ben Franklin’s birthday. He invented bifocals, swimming fins a long pole reaching device. (“He invented a tool called a “long arm”—a long wooden pole with a grasping claw at the end—to reach the books he wanted to read.”) We use one of those, a newer version, at least once every two weeks, not to reach books high on a shelf but things that fall out of reach. This morning we noticed that Va’s blue silk scarf had slipped down into the narrow space between the bannister and the mud room bench.

Called Dad. He thinks Hillary will get the White House even though he’s not really for her.

more perspective

from our DC reporter

  • Politics:  A friend of mine who is, ironically, a stock broker points out that “In 2008, the average per capita income in Britain will exceed the average per capita income in the US for the first time since the 1800s.  Vote for poverty. Vote Republican.”

back to creaturely life

dsc04629.jpg

Once the primary is over it is a relief to forget all that stuff and go back to ordinary concerns.  Such as  this painting which I now regret having painted over.  It wasn’t too bad, I like it now more than I did at first.  I should know better.  But such are the ups and downs of the creative process.  With painting there’s now saving of a draft and then recuperation.  Well, there can be in some ways but not as with writing.

And then there is having just finished a fantastic book, a study of W G Sebald by Eric Santner—On Creaturely Life.  Literary thought and criticism at its most luminous.  Santner’s meditations on Rilke,  Heidegger, Benjamin and  Sebald have given me more ways of thinking about Bram Van Velde’s paintings and more food for speculating how Beckett responded to them and drew from them as well as all that has happened in painting (and not) since then and on up to Sebald’s work of the last fifteen years.  Sebald uses photographs, however.  What if he had used abstract paintings and photographs.  Could he have even wanted to use abstract works?  Probably not.  But I would say that it is what Santner identifies as the sense of “the creaturely” that we can find in works by Van Velde and Still and not so much, perhaps, in Rothko or Olitski or Sean Scully.

have you voted yet?? NH Primary nagsheet

Scatterplot posted this earlier—deserves re-posting in honor of our great Primary

I did run into one of my students dowtown.  She has been canvassing for Hillary for the last three weeks, since the end of the semester.  Got $100. a week.  Tomorrow she’ll return to her job at a box store near Manchester.

a note from new hampshire

I spent most of the last three days* in New Hampshire. Two observations:

1.) Everyone I spoke to is already sick of the election. But many are still “undecided”.

2.) It was broadest range of political ideas I had ever heard expressed in the US. Read More »

Virginia’s book, here at last

dsc04644.jpgdsc04643.jpg

Voice & vision

Well, I was really wrong about Obama a few weeks ago when I talked about being disappointed with his appearance on campus.  I just watched his victory speech in Iowa on YouTube.  Great speech, no doubt about it.  And the audience–his relationship with the audience–both in synch, wired, electrifying.  Obama’s got the clear message, the tags for the vision and knows how to repeat them, call and response.

He’s got the election.  McCain will do the Republican ghost dance.