Monthly Archives: March 2010

News ← davidgarlitz.com

Dave playing in Cuba a few weeks ago

maybe but maybe not, there might be no other way to find out, although

Bernhard is so intoxicating that I want to try writing in his manner just as a short course in creative writing, the sort of course in writing I had never had the chance to take in my college years and the sort of course, however long, would be worth it, not the sort of workshop courses now available and now passing as creative writing courses, all of them too short and too shallow, and not at all like the course that imitating Bernhard would provide in the long run.

two movies (with a p.s. on Christopher Hitchens and the pope)

Matt Damon in “The Informant” directed by Steven Soderbergh.  Ehh.  Damon gives a good performance of a strange and ultimately sad fellow, a biochemist? who blows the whistle on his own coporation’s corruptions—global price fixing and kickbacks—but in the process reveals himself to be a compulsive liar, maybe bi-polar, maybe not, who mucks up everyone’s case, including the FBI’s.

After finishing it—and even while in the middle of it—I kept saying to myself—who in Hollywood or wherever pushed this project through to production and why on earth?  It is billed as a “dark comedy” but it just doesn’t make much of an interesting story finally just a sad one and not sad enough to be interesting or worth telling.  Damon soldiers through it with a good deal of good spirit than anyone else in the project.   That’s about it.

Few days later I have had second thoughts and realized that I missed a big and obvious thing here—that the whistleblower—the informant/attacker gets so riled at the flaws of those he works for–the authorities–yet manages to keep in an entirely separate–and sealed–container, his own flaws and failings–some of which–the central ones—are mirror images of the flaws he has whistleblown about.  Why did I miss that?

Thought about it in terms of Christopher Hitchens.  He is on Slate now going after the pope about the abuse scandal in the church—something Hitchens loves to do with great great zeal.  But in his own forthcoming memoir he confesses to his boyhood schooldays adventures in crossing over the gay/straight line(s).  Not the same thing as the abuse scandals in the church.  But maybe not far enough away for everyone to be comfortable.  In this sense:  under further interrogation and revelation, will Hitchens have anything more to say about these things?  Some commentators are already saying—oh for god’s sake why do we need a memoir now from this famously bad boy bad boy public scold and greatly umbraged (always) moralist?


“Broken Embraces” by Pedro Almodovar.  Here a Master at work, throwing pearls to all of his adorers and the cognoscenti.  Maybe not the greatest movie of his career but with lots of hallmarks and much better than many others and most importantly a joy to watch from beginning to end.  Intelligent and soapy, fluffy and deadly serious, kitsch and pop and serious stuff.  Wonderful.

vaporetto ride $1.50 in 1969–or 150 lire?

content-aware fill in new Photoshop–amazing voice

notebook from 1969—Virginia’s sketch

on today’s walk in Wal-Mart

the real news of the day is that while we were at Wally’s this morning, Virginia walking with the cart and me browsing I looked at a copy of a Brain magazine—and one article says what we’ve known for years—anti-depressant medications do not work, do not work any better than placebos.  This is research from a scientist or a psychologist, forget which, doesn’t matter, in Hull, UK. He says what really works is mild exercise and perhaps—depending—talking with various people, maybe a therapist, maybe not.  Again–new science shows.  And again—we’ve known this since way back, since the first book—was it “Prozac Nation”? argued the contrary, told tales of miracles and wonders.  Second big news article in this brain magazine was about the brain of older people—we are hard-wired it says to get happier, to forget the terrible memories and focus on the positive.

If only, I thought, we could have convinced Beckett to write More as he got older instead of Less.  Then his late works would be more full of this fuller optimism and happiness.  But maybe that is in fact the key to his late work—it  becomes harder and harder to figure out because in his bliss he is simply becoming more and more radiantly positive and happy.  Who needs to explain all this over and over again to your reading or theater-going audience when they tend to me sour middle-agers and you are now more and more happily ancient?  It does indeed fit my grandmother who died at one-month shy of 104 and my Dad still alive at 94.  His mind is sharp and his attitude amazing.  And his mother, Ella Drake Garlitz, the last time I talked with her, over the phone, maybe six months before she died, said in response to my question How are you doing? “Better.”  Oh, what was wrong I asked?  Nothing.  Things just get better and better.  She laughed.  She still had a highball every evening before dinner, stayed in her room and didn’t want anything to do with anyone else in the nursing home—they were all off their rockers she said—and she played her bridge games and was probably right.  She was lucid too until the end.  So I am hoping indeed to have her genes and my Dad’s.  And maybe I should be writing lots and lots more to make up for what Beckett failed to get down on paper for us all.

how to survive a world war

Edmund White has a long review essay on John Cheever in the NYRB—I got it from HuffPo –

Here’s the detail from the life I love best—-could anyone invent this?

quote

In 1942 he enlisted in the army and tested low-normal on the government IQ test. In 1942 he published his first short-story collection, “The Way Some People Live,” which wasn’t very good but may have saved his life since it impressed a major in the army who was also an MGM executive. He withdrew Cheever from his unit, which suffered terrible casualties in Europe in the last months of the war. Cheever was transferred as a writer to the former Paramount studios in Astoria, Queens.

White on Cheever

Bolaño—”Chilean Nocturne”

Fits in very well, though, with the mood of Roberto Bolaño’s late novella By Night in Chile which I finished last night.  In Spanish it is Nocturno de Chile—Chilean Nocturne—a much more meditative and musical title, more apt, sadder, sweeter, an elegaic tone.  Which fits the effect of the book, a long rambling final meditation by a dying priest who had an intersection with Pinochet and who reflects over the long arc of his life as he remembers the famous coup against Allende and the life in Chile after all of that.  You could try to pin various political positions onto the narrator but I think that is beside the point.  Now as he dies he is concerned with the long view regarding history and with the very short view of his own sense that his life is ending.  I suppose in Chile they can sense millions of resonances throughout the text that escape my radar, nuances about Chilean experience and identity, inside jokes, insider trades, self-reflective explorations of all sorts.  But the book also works at a “global” level well enough, much more haunting and powerful than I had at first thought it would be.  This is largely because Bolaño works the narrative into the high plain of lyrical narrative, floating us into that mental space, that chamber of the soul, in which all “dark nights,” all nocturnes, echo, find their location, resonate.

The final line of the story places it squarely back into Beckett’s world—but before that Bolaño seems to allow his priest the consolations of philosophy, the pleasures of reading the ancient Greeks while Pinochet is wrecking Chile, travels to Europe to visit the historic churches, and, finally, a minor life of a would-be poet, a life among the literary aspirants in the cultural life of Chile.  It’s all very comfortingly horrifying or horrifyingly comforting, as the narrative purrs along as effortlessly as any fugue by Bernhard or Sebald.


laugh with Bernhard

Charles Lambert said…
Yes, it’s hard to read more than a few pages of Bernhard without being moved to laughter by the sheer splenetic vigour of the writing.

http://this-space.blogspot.com/2010/02/books-of-disquiet.html